Agarose Coated Culture Plate in Tumorsphere Culture of Cervical Cancer Cell Line HeLa: an Alternative to Non Adhesive Culture Plate

Authors

  • Putu Juniartha Brawijaya University
  • Muhammad Rasjad Indra Brawijaya University
  • Hidayat Sujuti Brawijaya University
  • Diana Lyrawati Brawijaya University
  • Tatit Nurseta Brawijaya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/jtls.06.03.11

Keywords:

Cancer stem cell, tumorsphere, agarose, non adhesive culture plate, Sox2.

Abstract

Cervical cancer recurs in 90% cases and linked to cancer stem cells that able to self-renew and responsible for recurrence, metastasis, and mortality of cancer. Isolation and identification of cancer stem cells using serum-free medium needs expensive growth factors and consume time. This study try to grow tumor sphere using culture plate coated with 1% agarose as an efficient and economical alternative to non-adhesive culture plate. HeLa cell line was grew in culture plate coated with 1% agarose and non-adhesive culture plate using similar medium and culture condition. Tumor spheres morphology was observed and the colonies were counted in 7 days followed by single cell assay. Tumor spheres then counted for CD133+, CD34+, and Sox2 expression using flowcytometry. Culture plate coated with 1% agarose can be used as an economic and efficient alternative to culture tumor sphere. Using culture plate coated with 1% agarose, the tumor spheres formed in 7 days with similar morphology to non-adhesive culture plate. Tumorsphere had three dimensional – sphere shape that tightly attached, colonized, and overlapped. The tumor sphere colony counts of two plates were statistically have no significant difference (p=0,667). Single cell assay of a tumor sphere shows that it can grow new tumor spheres with similar morphology. The tumor sphere from culture plate coated with 1% agarose express CD133+ and CD34+ as much as 8.78% ± 2.14 and Sox2 as much as 35.30% ± 23.82 whereas tumor sphere from non-adhesive culture plate express CD133+ and CD34+ as much as 62.36% ± 1.06 and Sox2 as much as 98.86% ± 0.56 (p = 0000).

Author Biographies

Putu Juniartha, Brawijaya University

Department of Biomedical Science

Muhammad Rasjad Indra, Brawijaya University

Department of Physiology and Molecular

Hidayat Sujuti, Brawijaya University

Department of Biochemistry and Biomolecular

Diana Lyrawati, Brawijaya University

Department of Pharmacy, Department of Biomedical Sciences, 

Tatit Nurseta, Brawijaya University

Department of Obstetry and Gynecology, Saiful Anwar Public Hospital

References

Feng D, Cheng F, Cairong L et al (2009) Identification and Characterization of Cancer Stem – Like Cells from Primary Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri. Oncology Reports. 22: 1129 – 1134.

Siegel R, Carol D, Katherine V et al (2012) Cancer Treatment and Survivor Statistics. American Cancer Society. 1-22.

Chiva LM, Fernando L, Lucia GC et al (2008) Surgical Treatments of Reccurent Cervical Cancer: State of Art and New Achievements. Gynecologic Oncology. 110 (3): S60– S66.

Wang K, Hanfang Z, Lijing L et al (2013) Identification of a Cancer Stem Cell – Like Side Population in the HeLa Human Cervical Carcinoma Cell Line. Oncology Letters. 6: 1673 – 1680.

Wang L, Huijie G, Caiyu L et al (2014) Enrichment and Characterization of Cancer Stem – Like Cells from a Cervical Cancer Cell Line. Molecular Medicine Reports. 9: 2117 – 2123.

Baumann M, Krause M (2008) Tumor’s Biology Impact on Clinical Cure Rates in The Impact of Tumor Biology on Cancer Treatment and Multidisciplinary Strategies. Springer. 1: 324 – 325.

Ji J, Peng SZ (2010) Expression of Sox2 in Human Cervical Carcinogenesis. Human Pathology. 41: 1438 – 1447.

Calvet CY, Franck MA, Luis MM (2014) The Culture of Cancer Cell Lines as Tumorspheres Does Not Systematically Result in Cancer Stem Cell Enrichment. PloS ONE. Hal. 1 – 9.

Chen SF, Yun CC, Shin N et al (2012) Nonadhesive Culture System as a Model of Rapid Sphere Formation with Cancer Stem Cell Properties. PloS ONE. 7 (2): e31864.

Yongjian D, Jiang Q, Yu L et al (2012) A Simple Method for Isolating and Culturing Single Cancer Stem Cell. Journal of Southern Medical University. 32 (6): 802 – 806.

Zhang SL, Yi SW, Tong Z et al (2012) Isolation and Characterization of Cancer Stem Cells from Cervical Cancer HeLa Cells. Cytotechnology. 64: 477-484.

Lopez J, Adela P, Veverly M et al (2012) Cancer Initiating Cells Derived from Established Cervical Cell Lines Exhibit Stem Cell Markers and Increased Radioresistance. Biomed Central. 12 (48):1 – 14.

Sudiarta KE, Satuman, Wibi R et al (2015) The Efficacy of Taraxacum Officinale Leaves Extract in Regulate Apoptosis, RAR 2 Gene, and Sox2 Expression on β Primary Culture Human Cervical Cancer Stem Cells. International Journal of Pharmtech Research. 8 (4): 535- 544.

Zhang H, Su YL (2010) Research Progression of CD133 as a Marker of Cancer Stem Cells. Chinese Journal of Cancer. 29 (3): 243 – 247.

Sidney LE, Matthew JB, Siobhan ED et al (2014) Concise Review: Evidence for CD34 as a Common Marker for Diverse Progenitors. Stem Cell Express. 32: 1380 – 1389.

Roy UB, Eunjeong S, Lalitha R et al (2012) Sox2 Maintains Self – Renewal of Tumor Initiating Cells in Osteosarcomas. Oncogene. 31 (18): 2270 – 2282.

Liu KC, Bao SL, Meng Z et al (2013) The Multiple Role for Sox2 in Stem Cell Maintenance and Tumorigenesis. Cell Signal. 25 (5): 1 – 19.

Prasad NB, Biankin AV, Fukushima N et al (2005) Gene Expression Profiles in Pancreatic Epitehelial Neoplasia Reflects the Effects of Hedgehog Signaling on Pancreatic Ductal Epithelial Cells. Cancer Res. 65.1619 – 1626.

Wang Y, Robert B (2011) Cell Cycle Regulation by Micro RNAs in Stem Cells. Springer. 459 – 471.

Navarro A, Mariano M (2010) MicroRNAs in Human Embryonic and Cancer Stem Cells. Yonse Medicine Journal. 51 (5): 622 – 632.

Liu C, Dean GT (2011) MicroRNA Regulation of Cancer Stem Cells. Clinical Cancer Research. 71 (18): 5950 – 5954.

Peter ME (2009) Let-7 and Micro-200 MicroRNAs: Guardians Against Pluripotency and Cancer Progression. Cell Cycle. 8 (6): 843 – 852.

Jesus AB, Gema LA, Pablo M (2009) The miR 302 – 367 Cluster as a Potential Stemness Regulator in ESCs. Cell Cycle. 8 (3): 394 – 398.

Card DAG, Pratibha BH, Leping L et al (2008) Oct4/Sox2 Regulated miR – 302 Targets Cyclin D1 in Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 28

(20): 6426 – 6438.

Takahashi R, Hiroaki M, Takahiro O (2014) The Role of microRNAs in the Regulation of Cancer Stem Cells. Frontiers in Genetics. 4: 1-11

Rizzino A (2013) Concise Review: The Sox2 – Oct4 Connection: Critical Players in a Much Larger Independent Network Integrated at Multiple Levels. Stem Cell Express. 31: 1033 – 1039.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles