The Effectiveness of Various Types of Local Hydromacrophytes on The Phytoremediation Process of Catfish Pond Wastewater using a Batch Culture System
The Effectiveness of Various Types of Local Hydromacrophytes
Keywords:Batch culture, Catfish pond, Hydromacrophyte, Remediation, Wastewater, Water quality
This study aimed to determine the effectivity of various types of local hydromacrophytes on the remediation of wastewater from catfish culture ponds in Gondosuli village, Gondang, Tulungagung, East Java, Indonesia, using a batch culture system. This
experiment used a completely random design and was conducted in the glasshouse.
The batch culture system was conducted in a 30 L tank containing sand and gravel as
the medium for hydromacrophytes. This research consisted of five treatments (emergent, submerged, floating leaf, polyculture of 3 types of hydromacrophytes, and control without hydromacrophytes). This study was repeated three times at the same time.
The effectiveness of the phytoremediation model was monitored using indicators of
water physicochemical parameters and the biotic index of phytoplankton. The biotic
indices were used the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H') of phytoplankton and the
diatom biotic index (Trophic Diatom Index (TDI) and Percentage of Pollution Tolerant Value (%PTV)). After giving the treatment, monitoring was carried out on days 0,
10, 20, 30, and 40. The results showed that the batch culture system for phytoremediation post-harvest catfish pond wastewater with local hydromacrophytes improved the
water quality. However, not all water physicochemical parameters after treatments
meet Indonesian water quality standards. Abundance showed water quality fluctuations over time, while Shannon Wiener's diversity index (H' value) decreased as water
quality decreased. This study's PTV value demonstrated that pollutant levels vary by
treatment. Only the control and submerged hydromacrophytes improved their TDI
status; another treatment remained moderate. The best treatment was 40 days after
acclimatization with polyculture treatment of three types of local hydromacrophytes.
Research and other systems like continuous culture are needed for optimal results to
improve water quality.
Craig S, Helfrich L, Kuhn DD, Schwar MH (2017) Understanding Fish Nutrition, Feeds, and Feeding. Virginia Tech (6): 420–256.
Febriansyah SC and Retnaningdyah C (2021) Evaluation of The Effect of Age of Cultivation of Dumbo Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) on Changes in Pond Water Quality Using Plankton as Bioindicator in Gondosuli Village, Tulungagung Regency. Biotropika: Journal of Tropical Biology 9(2): 144–152. https://doi.org/10.21776/-ub.biotropika.2021.009.02.07.
Kafle A, Timilsina A, Gautam A, Adhikari K, Bhattarai A, Aryal N (2022) Phytoremediation: Mechanisms, plant selection and enhancement by natural and synthetic agents. Environmental Advances 8, 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enva-dv.2022.100203.
Martins APL, Reissmann CB, Boeger MRT, Oliveira EBD, Favaretto N (2010) Efﬁciency of Polygonum hydropiperoides for Phytoremediation of Fish Pond Efﬂuents Enriched with N and P. J. Aquat. Plant Manage 48: 116-120.
Retnaningdyah C, Arisoesilaningsih E, Samino S (2017) Use of local Hydromacrophytes as phytoremediation agent in pond to improve irrigation water quality evaluated by Diatom Biotic Indices. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity 18(4): 1611–1617. https://doi.-org/10.13057/biodiv/d180439.
Sundari AS, Retnaningdyah C (2013) The Effectiveness of Scirpus grossus and Limnocharis flava as Fitoremediation Agents of Nitrate-Phosphate to Prevent Microcystis Blooming in Fresh Water Ecosystem. Journal of Tropical Life Science 3 (1): 28-33.
Vidayanti V, Retnaningdyah C, Soeharjono S (2012) The Capability of Equisetum ramosissium and Typha angustifolia as Phytoremediation Agents to Reduce Nitrate-Phosphate Pollutants and Prevent Microcystis Blooming in Fresh Water Ecosystem. Journal of Tropical Life Science 2(3): 126–131. https://doi.org/10.11594/jtls.02.03.12.
Hu C, Ou Y, Zhang D, Zhang H, Yan C, Zhao Y, Zheng Z (2012) Phytoremediation of the polluted Waigang River and general survey on the variation of the phytoplankton population. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 19(9): 4168–4175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0931-z.
Clesceri L, Greenberg A, Eaton A (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.). American Public Health Association.
Bellinger EG and Sigee GC (2015). Freshwater algae: identification, enumeration and use as bioindicators. John Wiley & Sons.
Kelly MG (1998) Use of The Trophic Diatom Index to Monitor Eutrophication in Rivers. Water Research 32(1): 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00157-7.
Wu N, Schmalz B, Fohrer N (2014) Study Progress in Riverine Phytoplankton and its Use as Bio-Indicator – a Review. Austin J Hydrol 1(1): 9.
Lu Q, He ZL, Graetz DA, Stoffella PJ, Yang X (2010) Phytoremediation to remove nutrients and improve eutrophic stormwaters using water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 17(1): 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0094-0
Stone NM, Thomforde HK (2004) Understanding Your Fish Pond Water Analysis Report. University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, United States Department of Agriculture, and County Governments Cooperating.
Rahman AKML, Islam M, Hossain MZ, Ahsan MA (2012) Study of the seasonal variations in Turag river water quality parameters. African Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry 6(10): 144-48.
Sarda P, Sadgir P (2015) Assessment of multi parameters of water quality in surface water bodies-a review. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol, 3(8), 331-336.
Qin H, Zhang Z, Liu M, Liu H, Wang Y, Wen X, Zhang Y, Yan S (2016) Site test of phytoremediation of an open pond contaminated with domestic sewage using water hyacinth and water lettuce. Ecological Engineering 95: 753–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.07.022.
Verma AK, Singh TN (2013) Prediction of water quality from simple field parameters. Environmental Earth Sciences 69(3): 821–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1967-6.
Sawyer CN, McCarty PL, Parkin GF (2003) Chemistry for Environmental and Engineering Science. 5th ed. McGraw Hill Inc, New York.
Ciria MP, Solano ML, Soriano P (2005) Role of Macrophyte Typha latifolia in a Constructed Wetland for Wastewater Treatment and Assessment of Its Potential as a Biomass Fuel. Biosystems Engineering 92(4): 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.08.007.
Stefanidis K, Sarika M, Papastegiadou E (2019) Exploring environmental predictors of aquatic macrophytes in water‐dependent Natura 2000 sites of high conservation value: Results from a long‐term study of macrophytes in Greek lakes. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 29(7): 1133–1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3036.
Dewanti LPP, Putra IDNN, Faiqoh E (2018) Relationship of Phytoplankton Abundance and Diversity with Zooplankton Abundance and Diversity in Serangan Island Waters, Bali. Journal of Marine and Aquatic Sciences 4(2): 324. https://doi.org/10.24843/jmas.2018.v4.i02.324-335.
Wang YK, Stevenson RJ, Metzmeier L (2015) Development and evaluation of a diatom-based Index of Biotic Integrity for the Interior Plateau Ecoregion, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 24 (4): 990-1008. https://doi.org/10.1899/03-028.1
Declerck S, Vanderstukken M, Pals A, Muylaert K, Meester LD (2007) Plankton biodiversity along a gradient of productivity and its mediation by macrophytes. Ecology 88(9): 2199-2210.
Musa R, Greenfield R (2018) Use of diatom indices to categorize impacts on and recovery of a floodplain system in South Africa. African Journal of Aquatic Science 43(1): 59–69. https://doi.org/-10.2989/16085914.2018.1443907.
Retnaningdyah C, Arisoesilaningsih E, (2018) Using Benthic Diatom to Assess the Success of Batch Culture System Phytoremediation Process of Water Irrigation. Journal of Tropical Life Science. 8(3): 259–268. https://doi.org-/10.11594/jtls.08.03.08.
Xiao H, Peng S, Liu X, Jia J, Wang H (2021) Phytoremediation of nutrients and organic carbon from contaminated water by aquatic macrophytes and the physiological response. Environmental Technology & Innovation 21: 101295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101295.
Dai Y, Tang H, Chang J, Wu Z, Liang W (2014) What is better, Ceratophyllum demersum L. or Myriophyllum verticillatum L., individual or combined?. Ecological Engineering 70: 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.06.009.
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Tropical Life Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The work has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or part of a published lecture or thesis) and it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. When the manuscript is accepted for publication in this journal, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.
Journal of Tropical Life Science is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License