In Silico Molecular Characterization of a Putative Haloacid Dehalogenase Type II from Genomic of Mesorhizobium loti Strain TONO
In Silico Molecular Characterization of a Putative Haloacid Dehalogenase Type II
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/jtls.12.02.10Keywords:
Mesorhizobium loti strain TONO, dehalogenase, protein structure, haloacid dehalogenaseAbstract
Halogenated organic compounds are found as waste in the biosphere and can cause
numerous dilemmas because of their toxicity and persistence in the environment. They
play a major role in the quality of life of both, human beings and other living organisms. Degradation of these compounds by microorganisms is significant to reduce recalcitrant and cost. Thus, in the current study, an in-silico approach was used for homology modelling and docking assessment of a newly identified DehLt4, type II
dehalogenase to predict its ability to degrade selected haloalkanoic acids and haloacetates. The study aimed to establish the catalytic tendencies of the enzyme to optimally
degrade the selected halogenated haloacids. The refined modelled structure of DehLt4
using GROMACS 5.1.2 software revealed satisfactory scores of ERRAT (94.73%),
Verify3D (90.83%) and PROCHECK (99.05 %) assessments. Active site prediction
by blind docking and multiple sequence alignment indicated the catalytic triads for
DehLt4 were Asp9-Lys149-Asn175. Both L-2-chloropropionic acid (L-2-CP) and trichloroacetate (TCA) docked with DehLt4 exhibited binding energy of -3.9 kcal/mol.
However, the binding energy for D-2-chloropropionic acid (D-2-CP) and monochloroacetate (MCA) was -3.8 kcal/mol and -3.1 kcal/mol, respectively. Thus, the findings
of the study successfully identified the catalytic important residues of DehLt4 for possible pollutant degradation. The in-silico study as such has a good potential for characterization of newly identified dehalogenases based on basic molecular structure and
functions analysis.
Keywords: Dehalogenase, Haloacid dehalogenase, Mesorhizobium loti strain TONO,
Protein structure
References
Douglas SH, Dixon B, Griffin D (2018) Assessing the abilities of intrinsic and specific vulnerability models to indicate groundwater vulnerability to groups of similar pesticides: a comparative study. Physical Geography 39(6): p. 487-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2017.1406300.
Gribble GW (2015) A recent survey of naturally occurring organohalogen compounds. Environmental Chemistry 12(4): p. 396-405. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN15002.
Adamu A, Wahab RA, Aliyu F et al. (2020) Haloacid dehalogenases of Rhizobium sp. and related enzymes: catalytic properties and mechanistic analysis. Process
Biochemistry 92: 437 – 446. doi:
1016/j.procbio.2020.02.002.
Zakary s, Oyewusi HA, Huyop F (2021) Dehalogenases for pollutant degradation: A mini review. Jornal of Tropical Life Science 11(1): p. 17-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.11594/jtls.11.01.03.
Slater JH, Bull AT, Hardman DJ (1995) Microbial dehalogenation. Biodegradation 6 (3): 181-189. doi:10.1007/BF00700456.
Weightman AJ, Topping AW, Hill KE et al. (2002) Transposition of DEH, a broad-host-range transposon flanked by ISPpu12, in Pseudomonas putida is associated with genomic rearrangements and dehalogenase gene silencing. Journal of Bacteriology 184(23): p. 6581-6591. doi/10.1128/JB.184.23.6581-6591.2002.
Hill KE, Marchesi JR, Weightman AJ (1999) Investigation of Two Evolutionarily Unrelated Halocarboxylic Acid Dehalogenase Gene Families. Journal of Bacteriology 181 (8): 2535-2547. doi:
1128/JB.181.8.2535-2547.1999.
Janssen DB, Oppentocht JE, Poelarends GJ (2001) Microbial dehalogenation. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 12(3): p. 254-258.doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00208-1.
Bagherbaigi S, Gicana RG, Lamis RJ et al. (2013) Characterisation of Arthrobacter sp. S1 that can degrade α and β-haloalkanoic acids isolated from contaminated soil. Annals of Microbiology 63(4): p. 1363-1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-012-0595-4.
Hardman DJ, Sater JH (1981) Dehalogenases in soil bacteria. Microbiology 123(1): p. 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-123-1-117.
Adamu A, Wahab RA, Huyop F (2016) L-2-Haloacid dehalogenase (DehL) from Rhizobium sp. RC1. Springer Plus 5(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2328-9.
Oyewusi HA, Huyop F, Wahab RA (2020) Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation of Bacillus thuringiensis dehalogenase against haloacids,
haloacetates and chlorpyrifos. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 1-16. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1835727.
Shimoda Y, Hirakawa H, Sato S et al. (2016) Wholegenome sequence of the nitrogen-fixing symbiotic Rhizobium Mesorhizobium loti strain TONO. Genome Announcements 4 (5). doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01016-16.
Zakary S, Oyewusi HA, Huyop F (2021) Genomic analysis of Mesorhizobium loti strains reveals dehalogenases for bioremediation. Jornal of Tropical Life Science 11(1) 67 – 77. http://dx.doi.org/10.11594/jtls.11.01.09.
Nardi-Dei V, Kurihara T, Okamura T et al. (1994) Comparative studies of genes encoding thermostable L-2-halo acid dehalogenase from Pseudomonas sp. strain YL, other dehalogenases, and two related hypothetical proteins from Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 60(9): p. 3375-3380. doi/10.1128/aem.60.9.3375-3380.1994.
Murdiyatmo U, Asmara W, Tsang JS et al. (1992) Molecular biology of the 2-haloacid halidohydrolase IVa from Pseudomonas cepacia MBA4. Biochemical journal, 284(1): p. 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2840087.
Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A et al. (2005) Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server, in The proteomics protocols handbook. Springer p. 571-607. DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-890-0:571.
Corpet F (1988) Multiple sequence alignment with
hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Research 16 (22): 10881-10890. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.22.10881.
Combet C, Blanchet C, Geourjon C et al. (2000) NPS@: network protein sequence analysis. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 25(3): p. 147-150. doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01540-6.
Garnier J, Gibrat JF, Robson B (1996) [32] GOR method for predicting protein secondary structure from amino acid sequence, in Methods in Enzymology. Elsevier p. 540-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(96)66034-0.
Biasini MS, Bienert A. Waterhouse K, Arnold et al. (2014) SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Research 42(W1): p. W252-W258. doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku340.
DeLano WL (2002) Pymol: An open-source molecular graphics tool. CCP4 Newsletter on Protein Crystallography 40(1): p. 82-92.
Schmid N, Eichenberger AP, Choutko A et al. (2011) Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7. European Biophysics Journal 40(7): p. 843-856.
Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B et al. (2005) GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. Journal of Computational Chemistry 26(16): p. 1701-1718.
Lindahl E, Hess B, Van Der Spoel D (2001) GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. Molecular Modeling Annual 7(8): p. 306-317. doi.org/10.1007/s008940100045.
Lemkul J, (2018) From proteins to perturbed Hamiltonians: A suite of tutorials for the GROMACS-2018 molecular simulation package [article v1. 0]. Living Journal of Computational Molecular Science 1(1): p. 5068. doi.org/10.33011/livecoms.1.1.5068.
Colovos C, Yeates TO (1993) Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Science 2(9): p. 1511-1519.
Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS et al. (1993) PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. Journal of Applied Crystallography 26(2): p. 283-291. doi.org/10.1107/S0021889892009944.
Lüthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D (1992) Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 356(6364): p. 83-85. doi.org/10.1038/356083a0.
Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC et al. (2004) UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. Journal of Computational Chemistry 25(13): p. 1605-1612. doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084.
Schmidberger JW, Wilce JA, Tsang JS et al. (2007) Crystal structures of the substrate free-enzyme, and reaction intermediate of the HAD superfamily member, haloacid dehalogenase DehIVa from Burkholderia cepacia MBA4. Journal of Molecular Biology 368(3): p. 706-717. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2007.02.015.
Kurihara T, Liu JQ, Nardi-Dei V et al. (1995) Comprehensive site-directed mutagenesis of L-2-halo acid dehalogenase to probe catalytic amino acid residues. The Journal of Biochemistry 117(6): p. 1317-1322. doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124861
McGuffin LJ (2007) Benchmarking consensus model quality assessment for protein fold recognition. BMC Bioinformatics 8(1): p. 345. doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-345.
Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S et al. (2018) SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Research 46(W1): p. W296-W303. doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky427.
Pang BC, Tsang JS (2001) Mutagenic analysis of the conserved residues in dehalogenase IVa of Burkholderia cepacia MBA4. FEMS Microbiology Letters 204(1): p. 135-140. doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10876.x.
Yan C, Xu X, Zou X (2016) Fully blind docking at the atomic level for protein-peptide complex structure prediction. Structure 24(10): p. 1842-1853. doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2016.07.021.
Yu J, Shi J, Zhang Y, Yu Z et al. (2020) Molecular Docking and Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Dichloromethane Dehalogenase to Improve Enzyme Activity for Dichloromethane Degradation. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 190(2): p. 487-505. doi.org/10.1007/s12010-019-03106-x.
Lemmon G, Meiler J (2013) Towards ligand docking including explicit interface water molecules. PloS one 8(6): p. e67536. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067536.
Mishra R, Mazumder A, Mazumder R et al. (2019) Docking Study and Result Conclusion of Heterocyclic Derivatives Having Urea and Acyl Moiety. Asian J Biomed Pharmaceut Science 9(67): p. 13.
Fu Y, Zhao J, Chen Z (2018) Insights into the molecular mechanisms of protein-ligand interactions by molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation: a case of oligopeptide binding protein. Computational and Mathematical Methods In Medicine 2018.
Muslem WH, Edbeib MF, Aksoy HM et al. (2019) Biodegradation of 3-chloropropionic acid (3-CP) by Bacillus cereus WH2 and its in silico enzyme-substrate docking analysis. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 38(11), pp.3432-3441. doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2019.1655482.
Ridder IS, Rozeboom HJ, Dijkstra BW et al. (1995) Crystallization and preliminary Xâ€ray analysis of Lâ€2â€haloacid dehalogenase from xanthobacter autotrophicus GJ10. Protein Science 4(12): p. 2619-2620. doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560041220.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Tropical Life Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The work has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or part of a published lecture or thesis) and it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. When the manuscript is accepted for publication in this journal, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.
Journal of Tropical Life Science is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
_.png){kind=logo}
