Soil Arthropod Diversity and Composition Inhabited Various Habitats in Universitas Brawijaya Forest in Malang East Java Indonesia


  • Amin Setyo Leksono Departement of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia
  • Ninda Merisa Putri
  • Zulfaidah Penata Gama
  • Bagyo Yanuwiyadi
  • Anisa Zairina


Abundance, composition, diversity, forest, soil arthropod


A study on soil arthropod abundance, diversity and composition have been done on November 2016 to March 2017 using pitfall traps. The objective of this study is to analyze variations of the soil arthropod abundance, diversity and composition among different habitats in a university forest.  The study was carried out in Universitas Brawijaya Forest (UBF) Malang, East Java (7°49'S, 112°34'E, 1,200 m in altitude), consisted of four locations: an agroforestry (AF), a gallery forest (GF), the pine stands (PS) and a settlement yard (SY). At each site, a total of 10 traps (5 by 2 rows) were placed systematically at 4-m intervals. Glass cups (10 cm in diameter and 7 cm deep) were buried in the ground during 24 hours. There were 2286 individuals of arthropod collected from all sampling locations. Overall the samples collected consist of 41 families of arthropods. The abundance (mean ± SE) of soil arthropod was highest in PS and the lowest in SY. Statistically, variations in abundance among locations were significant (F = 7.39, p < 0.01). The taxa richness of arthropod was highest in GF and the lowest in SY. Statistically, variations in taxa richness among locations were significant (F = 4.26, p < 0.05).  The diversity was the highest in the GF (1.9 ± 0.1) lowest in the SY (0.74 ± 0.1). Statistically, variations in diversity among study sites were significant (F = 26.73, p < 0.001). In general, scavenger dominated the composition of soil arthropods. The highest proportion of scavenger abundance present in SY was 84.9%, while the lowest in the GF was 29.3%. The highest litter transformer composition in GF was 33.9%, and the lowest in SY was 8%. The highest decomposer in PS was 26.9% and the lowest in AF was 12.9%. The highest predator in AF was 20.7% and the lowest in SY was 1%. Compositions of soil arthropod were affected by environmental factors such as soil temperature and light intensity.


Stamps WT, Erik A, Nelson EA, Linit MJ, (2009) Survey of diversity and abundance of ground-dwelling arthropods in a black walnut-forage alley-cropped system in the mid-western united states. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 82 (1):46-62. doi: 10.2317/JKES705.01.1

Schowalter TD, Zhang YL, Rykken JJ (2010) Litter invertebrate responses to variable density thinning in Western Washington. Forest Ecological Applications 13:1204–1211. doi: 10.1890/02-5187.

Toana MH, Mudjiono G, Karindah S, Abadi AL (2014) Diversity of arthopods on cocoa plantation in three strata of shade tree Agrivita 36 (2): 120-127. doi:

Rohyani IS, Ahmadi H (2017) Short communication: Diversity and abundance of soil insects at jeruk manis protected forest in East Lombok (Indonesia) using several trapping methods. Biodiversitas 18 (2): 809-812. doi.10.13057/biodiv/d180253

Dallmeier F, Comiskey JA (1998) Forest Biodiversity Research, Monitoring and Modelling: Conceptual Background and Old World Case Studies. Unesco, Paris and The Parthenon Publ.New York.

Leksono AS, Nakagoshi N, Isagi Y (2005) The effect of forest disturbance on flying insect assemblages in Trawas, East Java. Tropics 14: 335-343. doi: 10.3759/tropics.14.335.

Partel M, Chiarucci A, Chytry M, Pillar VD (2017) Mapping plant community ecology. Journal of vegetation Science 28(1):1-3.

Santoso E, Sugiyama N, Hikosaka S, Kawabata S (2003) Cultivation of amorphophallus muelleri blume in timber forests of East Java, Indonesia. Jpn. J. Trop. Agr 47: 190-197. doi: 10.11248/jsta1957.47.190

Leksono AS, Yanuwiadi B, Kusuma Z, Farid A, Maulana F (2011) Influence of porang (Amorphophalus muelleri) cultivation on the composition of soil arthropods in tropical agroforestry areas in East Java, Indonesia. J.Trop.Life.Science 1 (2): 76-81. doi: 10.11594/jtls.01.02.05.

Santorufo L, Van Gestel CAM, Rocco A, Maisto G. (2012) Soil invertebrates as bioindicators of urban soil quality. Environmental Pollution 161:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.09.042

Suheriyanto D, Soemarno, Yanuwiadi B, Leksono A. S. (2016) Soil arthropods diversity on the forest floor and ex-road in Manggis Gadungan Kediri Regency. Indonesia Jurnal Teknologi 78(5): 399-403.

Zayadi H, Hakim L, Leksono AS (2013) Composition and diversity of soil arthropods of Rajegwesi Meru Betiri National Park. Journal of tropical life science 3:166–171.

Musyafa (2005) The roles of soil macrofauna on litter decomposition of Acacia mangium Wild. Biodiversitas 6 (1): 63-65.doi:10.13057/biodiv/d060113

Sota T, Nakano S, Hasan N, Hasyim A, Syafril and Nakamura K (2001) Fluctuation in the abundance of terresterial arthropods at an arable field in west sumatran highland. Tropics, 10(3): 463- 472.

Lilies SC. 1992 Key Determination of Insects. Jakarta, Kanisius.

Johnson NF, Triplehorn CA. (1989)Borror and Delong’s Introduction to the Study of Insects. 7th Edition.

Suin NM (1997) Ecology of Soil Fauna. Jakarta, Bumi Aksara.

Price PW, Denno RF, Eubanks MD, Finke DL, I Kaplan (2011) Insect Ecology: Behavior, Populations and Communities. UK, Cambridge University Press.

Syaufina L, Haneda NF. Buliyansih A (2007) Keanekaragaman arthropoda tanah di hutan pendidikan gunung walat. Media Konservasi 57 – 66.

Holzer B, Jacot A, Brinkof MWG (2003) Condition-dependent signaling affects male sexual attractiveness in field crickets, Gryllus campestris. Behavioral Ecology 14(3): 353-359.

Ritz MS, Kochler G (2007) Male behaviour over the season in a wild population of the field cricket Gryllus campestris L. Ecological Entomology 32(4): 384-392.

Endo C (2008) An analysis of the horizontal burrow morphology of the oriental mole cricket (Gryllotalpa orientalis) and the distribution pattern of surface vegetation. Canadian Journal of Zoology 86 (11): 1299-1306.

Rodriguez-Muñoz R, Bretman A, Walling C, Slate J, Tregenza T (2010): Natural and sexual selection in a wild insect population. Science 328 (5983): 1269 1272.doi:10.1126/science.1188102.

Bretman A, Rodriguez-Muñoz R, Walling C, Slate J, Tregenza T (2011) Fine-scale population structure, inbreeding risk and avoidance in a wild insect population. Molecular Ecology 20(14):

Rada S, Mazalová M, Šipoš J, Kuras T (2014) Impacts of moving, grazing and edge effect on orthoptera of submontane grasslands: perspectives for biodiversity protection. Polish Journal of Ecology 62: 123–138. doi:10.3161/104.062.0112.

Wilkie KTR, Mertl AL, Traniello JFA (2010) Species diversity and distribution patterns of the ants of amazonian ecuador. Plos One 5(10):1-12.

Peck SL, McQuaid B, Campbell CL (1998) Using ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as a biological indicator of agroecosystem condition. Environmental Entomology 27(5): 1102-1110. doi:10.1093/ee/27.5.1102.

Nakamura A, Catterall CP, House APN, Kitching RL, Burwell CJ (2007) The use of ants and other soil and litter arthropods as bio-indicators of the impacts of rainforest clearing and subsequent land use. Journal of Insect Conservation 11(2): 177-186.doi: 10.1007/s10841-006-9034-9.

Wang C, Strazanac J, Butler L. (2000). Abundance, diversity, and activity of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in oak-dominated mixed Appalachian forest treated with microbial pesticides. Environmental Entomology 29 (3):

Graham JH, Krzysik AJ, Kovacic DA, Duda JJ, Freeman DC, Emlen JM, Zak JC, Long RW, Wallace MP, Chamberlin-Graham C, Nutter JP, Balbach HE (2009) Species richness, equitability, and abundance of ants in disturbed landscapes. Ecological Indicators 9(5):866-877.