Isolation and Screening of Potential Cellulolytic and Xylanolytic Bacteria from Soil Sample for Degradation of Lignocellulosic Biomass

Bhupal Govinda Shrestha, Sanjaya Ghimire, Shakep Bhattarai, Sailesh Phuyal, Bimal Thapa


Cellulolytic/Xylanolytic microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi are accountable for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass in soil. Despite this vast number of cellulose/xylanase producers, there is a deficiency of microorganisms that can produce a significant amount of cellulase/xylanase enzyme to proficiently degrade cellulose/xylan to fermentable sugars. Although bacteria have extremely high natural diversity, which bestows
them with the aptitude to produce stable enzymes, little emphasis has been given to cellulose/xylanase production from bacteria. Seven soil samples were collected from eastern hilly districts of Nepal viz. Taplejung, Panchthar and Sankhuwasabha districts, from soil surface and at depth of 10cm to 20cm, and were isolated separately. From the seven soil samples, four bacterial isolates were obtained. Isolates (PSS, P1D, TLC, SNK) were then screened for cellulolytic/xylanolytic activity using Congo red assay on Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)/xylan agar plates. The enzyme activity obtained from isolates was dependent on substrate concentration. The activity of enzymes produced by isolates were also measured and compared on pretreated sugarcane bagasse. Among those samples, the greatest zone of inhibition in both CMC (1.3 cm) and xylan (1.0 cm) agar media was seen in isolate P1D. It also produced the highest activity of endoglucanase and xylanase i.e. activity 0.035 U/mL and 0.050 U/mL respectively at 0.010 mg mL-1 standard substrate concentration of CMC and xylan.



Lignocellulosic biomass, Cellulase, Xylanase, Enzyme activity, Pretreatment

Full Text:



Sutherland IW (1999) Polysaccharases for microbial exopolysaccharides. Carbohydrate Polymers 38 (4): 319– 328. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(98)00114-3.

Terra WR, Ferreira C (1994) Insect digestive enzymes: properties, compartmentalization and function. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology -- Part B: Biochemistry and 109 (1): 1–62. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(94)90141-4..

Chen H (2014) Chemical Composition and Structure of Natural Lignocellulose. In: Biotechnol. Lignocellulose. Theory Pract. 25–71.

Lee D, Owens VN, Boe A, Jeranyama P (2007) Composition of herbaceous biomass feedstocks. South Dakota, Brookings, SD: North Central Sun Grant Center.

Malherbe S, Cloete TE (2002) Lignocellulose biodegradation: Fundamentals and applications. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology 1 (2): 105–114. doi: 10.1023/A:1020858910646.

Kaylen M, Van Dyne DL, Choi YS, Blase M (2000) Economic feasibility of producing ethanol from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Bioresource Technology 72 (1): 19–32. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00091-7.

Lee J (1997) Biological conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol. Journal of Biotechnology 56 (1): 1–24. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1656(97)00073-4.

Irfan M, Safdar A, Syed Q, Nadeem M (2012) Isolation and screening of cellulolytic bacteria from soil and optimization of cellulase production and activity. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry 37 (July): 287–293. doi:


Saratale GD, Saratale RG, Oh SE (2014) Production and characterization of multiple cellulolytic enzymes by isolated Streptomyces sp. MDS. Biomass and Bioenergy 47 302–315. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.030.

Gupta P, Samant K, Sahu A (2012) Isolation of cellulosedegrading

bacteria and determination of their cellulolytic potential. Int J Microbiol. doi: 10.1155/2012/578925

Ekperigin MM (2007) Preliminary studies of cellulase production by A. cinetobacter anitratus and Branhamella sp. African J Biotechnol 6 (1): 28–33.

Uma Maheswari M, Chandra TS (2000) Production and potential applications of a xylanase from a new strain of Streptomyces cuspidosporus. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 16 (3): 257–263. doi: 10.1023/A:1008945931108.

Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B et al. (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology 96 (6): 673–686. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025.

Kuhad RC, Gupta R, Singh A (2011) Microbial cellulases and their industrial applications. Enzyme Research 2011 280696. doi: 10.4061/2011/280696.

Trujillo-Cabrera Y, Ponce-Mendoza A, Vásquez-Murrieta MS et al. (2013) Diverse cellulolytic bacteria isolated from the high humus, alkaline-saline chinampa soils. Annals of Microbiology 63 (2): 779–792. doi: 10.1007/s13213-012- 0533-5.

Yennamalli RM, Rader AJ, Kenny AJ et al. (2013) Endoglucanases: insights into thermostability for biofuel applications. Biotechnology for biofuels 6 (1): 136. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-136.

Almeida JRM, Fávaro LCL, Quirino BF (2012) Biodiesel biorefinery: opportunities and challenges for microbial production of fuels and chemicals from glycerol waste. Biotechnology for biofuels 5 (1): 48. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-48.

Maki ML, Broere M, Leung KT, Qin W (2011) Characterization of some efficient cellulase producing bacteria isolated from paper mill sludges and organic fertilizers. International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2 (2): 146–154.

Bhat MK (2000) Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotechnology Advances 18 (5): 355–383. doi: 10.1016/S0734-9750(00)00041-0.

Okeke BC, Lu J (2011) Characterization of a defined cellulolytic and xylanolytic bacterial consortium for bioprocessing of cellulose and hemicelluloses. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 163 (7): 869–881. doi:10.1007/s12010-010-9091-0.

Kaphle P, Rana S, Bhandari J et al. (2014) Isolation and Optimization of Cellulolytic and Xylanolytic Microbes from Nepal and their Utilization for Lignocellulosic Biomass Degradation. International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies 1 (4): 1-10.


Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Tropical Life Science